RSS Feed

Dyes turn windows into powerful solar panels

July 11th, 2008 · No Comments

SolarWindow.gif

Windows could be used as powerful solar panels thanks to a clever new technology that concentrates the sun’s rays. The technique uses transparent dyes to capture, concentrate and redirect light along the surface of the glass to photovoltaic (PV) cells in the frame, which convert the light into electricity. The breakthrough means that there is a tenfold increase in power output compared to use of the PV cell alone.

The team, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), claims the technology could slash the cost of generating electricity from sunlight, making it more competitive with standard grid power. This is because the expensive PV cells only need to be installed at the sides of the panels, rather than across the whole surface.

Sunlight is concentrated in existing solar power devices using large, mobile mirrors that track the sun as it moves across the sky. But these can be expensive to deploy and maintain. In the MIT device, called an “organic solar concentrator” and described in the latest issue of Science, the researchers painted a mixture of organic dyes onto the surface of a pane of glass. The dyes trap different wavelengths of sunlight and then guide the energy along the glass towards the PV cells at the edges.

“The point of all this is to get away with using far fewer solar cells,” said Marc Baldo, an electrical engineer at MIT. “The concentrator collects light over its whole front surface, but the solar cells need only cover the area of the edges.”

As the edges of a glass panel can often be 100 times smaller in area than the surface itself, he added, solar panels would need 100 times fewer PV cells to collect the same energy. “So we can save money. Since industry can’t produce enough solar cells to satisfy demand, this might also be a good way to stretch production.”

As well as windows, the technique can be applied to standard solar panels on roofs and walls to improve their efficiency. “We think the technology should cost less than $1 per watt [to build]“, said Baldo.

The MIT device is relatively simple to manufacture and researchers claim it could be commercially available within three years.

Martyn Berry, senior research and development engineer at solar-energy company Solarcentury, said the biggest challenge for PV technology was to make it competitive with standard electricity.”The notion that we could see a tenfold reduction on the cost of PV technologies through the use of organic solar concentrators is certainly exciting. Current concentrator technology is not generally suitable for the mass market.”

Baldo said any transparent material could be used as the concentrator. “In the window application you’d probably design the window for 10% transmission [of light]. The remaining 90% is captured and used to generate electricity.”

A more immediate use of the concentrator technology would be to coat the conventional solar panels used on the roofs of buildings, to boost their light collecting ability.

“We saw approximately 30% higher performance in the combined system compared to a stand alone solar cell,” said Baldo. “We think that ultimately this approach will allow us to nearly double the performance of existing solar cells for minimal added cost.”

A similar method to concentrate solar energy was developed in the 1970s. But the system, which painted dyes onto plastic surfaces, was abandoned because it could not collect enough of the sunlight and much of the retransmitted light was absorbed and lost as it travelled through the material to the PV cells.

To make their breakthrough, Baldo’s team used advances originally developed to improve lasers and organic light-emitting diodes. By using the newer dyes in carefully chosen ratios and applying it only to the surface of a glass panel, the scientists were able to more accurately control how much light was absorbed and transported across it. “We made it so the light can travel a much longer distance,” said Jonathan Mapel of MIT, who also worked on the solar concentrator.

Greenpeace’s chief scientist, Doug Parr, said: “Innovations like this show renewable technologies can take a quantum leap forward if given proper financial support from governments. Rather than betting the farm on outdated nuclear technology and hoping that coal will one day be ‘clean’, Gordon Brown should be creating green jobs and pushing at the real technological frontier of the 21st century – renewables.”

[Source: The Guardian]


Tags: · , , , , , , , , , ,


If you liked this article, you maybe interested in the following

0 comments for this entry ↓

  • There are no comments yet for this entry.

Leave a Comment

  • Climate Crunch

    Climate Crunch Network
    Climate Crunch, the new environmental news network site will provide news and views from around the internet. Gathering it’s content from news agencies,sites, blogs & videos it provides a unique view of current affairs and opinions from across the world regarding the environment and climate change.

    Click here to try Climate Crunch

    Twitter



    Latest From Climate Crunch | Whats popular


    Solar Surge iPod and iPhone Cases Are Now Available!

    [Technology] Just in time for sunny spring days, Novothink has announced that its hotly anticipated Solar Surge iPod and iPhone cases have hit the market and are available for sale! We’ve followed these sleek solar cases all the way from their concept renderings, and we’re excited to say that the potent photovoltaic chargers look even better [...] [Inhabitat Technology]


    Richard Branson Aims to Rock the Boat for Green Shipping

    [Energy] The billionaire's new NGO, Carbon War Room, puts the global shipping industry's massive carbon footprint under the spotlight, and spread the word about simple ways to shrink its impact. [GreenBiz Energy]


    Will the Nissan Leaf Battery Deliver All It Promises?

    [Transport] The Nissan Leaf electric vehicle is set to be released in a few months, with Nissan pushing it ahead of their original 2011 release date, and even ahead of the official release of the Chevy Volt in November. Some industry insiders are wondering whether Nissan has cut a few corners in order to get [...] [Inhabitat Transport]


    Democrats toughen up on finance reform. Could it work for clean energy?

    [News] by Jonathan Hiskes A funny thing happened outside the twisted world of Congressional energy politics. Over at the Senate Banking Committee, Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) announced he’s going to push forward with finance reform and consumer protection bill, even if Republicans don’t want to help. This comes after weeks of negotiating between Dodd and Tennessee Republican Bob Corker, who showed more interest in protecting large banks and predatory lenders. (Payday lenders, as it happens, have a strong presence in Tennessee and have given Corker more than $31,000.) Now Dodd’s fed up and moving the bill. As a result, Congress may eventually get something done on the issue. On healthcare reform too, Harry Reid sent Mitch McConnell a letter saying he’s done playing games with Republicans who want to “start over.” Instead, he’s going to finish the job: Though we have tried to engage in a serious discussion, our efforts have been met by repeatedly debunked myths and outright lies. At the same time, Republicans have resorted to extraordinary legislative maneuvers in an effort not to improve the bill, but to delay and kill it. After watching these tactics for nearly a year, there is only one conclusion an objective observer could make: these Republican maneuvers are rooted less in substantive policy concerns and more in a partisan desire to discredit Democrats, bolster Republicans, and protect the status quo on behalf of the insurance industry. On healthcare, and possibly finance, Senate Democrats will have to pass bills through budget reconciliation to avoid Republican filibuster threats. They’ll face verbal attacks and they won’t have the comfort of Republicans voting with them. But, assuming the bills are any good, they’ll be doing the right thing. Back in energy world … Meantime, the engineers of a clean-energy bill are stuck playing the bipartisanship game. You have senators saying convoluted, nonsensical things about a hypothetical bill, as Dave Roberts notes. You have the lead trio—John Kerry, Lindsey Graham, Joe Lieberman—negotiating with fossil-fuel industry groups who are arguing in court that climate-change isn’t a threat to human welfare, as Brad Johnson notes. (“We don’t believe in the problem, but we’ve got the solution!”) Kate Sheppard asked Sen. Barbara Boxer if the new scheme is really the best method to create green jobs, promote energy independence, and curb climate pollution. Boxer didn’t even try to defend the plan on its actual merits. “I’m not going to make an argument that the [new] approach is better [than last fall’s Kerry-Boxer bill] ... Is it better than doing nothing? Absolutely,” she said. So the question is, does it have to be this way? Can’t Democratic leaders grow a pair and muscle a bill through Congress? For Senate Democratic leaders, it’s not yet a question of balls or no balls, because it’s not clear they have 50 votes to use in reconciliation (or in a future when the filibuster is fixed). Energy politics don’t line up along the familiar red-blue divide—rural Democrats, especially from coal-rich states, have historically voted with their Republican counterparts in support of the status quo. So it’s not quite the same situation as with financial reform. But for individual senators, there is a question of toughness. Any plan to make polluters pay for the heat-trapping gasses they emit will be easy to demonize. Those lawmakers will have to explain to voters why it’s in the country’s interest. They won’t have the comfort of many Republicans voting with them. They’ll have to explain why it was the right vote anyway—why bipartisanship matters less to them than addressing an urgent threat. Several threats, actually—global warming, foreign-oil dependence, unemployment, and diminishing technological leadership. That’s the issue facing hesitant Democrats like Byron Dorgan, Ben Nelson, and Jim Webb. On that issue of toughness … Finally, the veterans’ group VoteVets.org provides some perspective on why making a vote for energy independence is considerably less “tough” than facing insurgencies funded by petrodictators in the Middle East. Related Links: How the cap-and-trade controversy could lead to good clean energy policy Job Creation Begins at Home How to provide relief to rural Americans, create jobs, and lower emissions ... all at once! [Grist Climate and Energy]


    China Developing “Combustible Ice” as New Energy Source

    [Energy] Last September, China discovered a large reserve of “combustible ice” on the tundra of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. “Combustible ice” is essentially frozen natural gas – a natural gas hydrate, and is one of the newest energy sources to be discovered. The new reserves found in China reveal a very large supply equal at least 35 [...] [Inhabitat Energy]


    More Americans say global warming exaggerated: poll

    [News] WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A growing number of Americans, nearly half the country, think global warming worries are exaggerated, as more people also doubt that scientific warnings of severe environmental fallout will ever occur, according to a new Gallup poll. [Reuters]


    Bead-Filled Washing Maching Uses 90% Less Water

    [Technology] A new washing machine design uses 90 percent less water and reduces utility bills by 30 percent by cleaning clothes with tiny plastic beads. The machine by UK company Xeros Ltd uses 3mm-long nylon beads that can get into all crevices and folds of clothing and absorb stains and dirt.  Stephen Burkinshaw, a polymer chemist at Leeds University, discovered that nylon beads at 100 percent humidity could attract stains away from clothing and into the center of the beads, preventing deposition back onto the clothes. The machine uses a small amount of water to dampen the clothes and to reach the right humidity level, then the drum is flooded with the beads.  When the cycle is complete the beads drain away with the water to be reused hundreds of times. I'm sure you've already started questioning what happens to these plastic beads once they're done scrubbing clothes.  The company wants to eventually create a closed loop where the saturated beads can be refreshed and reused in the machines, but for the time being they will be collected and recycled. Xeros says that if all of the US used these machines instead of regular washing machines, it would save 1.2 billion tonnes of water per year and  the CO2 emissions saved would equal taking 5 million cars off the road.  The machine would also eliminate the need to dry clean many delicates, another environmental benefit.  The Xeros machine is expected to be available by the end of next year. via Guardian   [EcoGeek]



    Climate Crunch | the complete climate change news service Get the latest buzz from Climate Crunch


  • Communities

  • -->

      My Archives
  • February 2010 (17)
  • January 2010 (19)
  • December 2009 (9)
  • November 2009 (21)
  • October 2009 (29)
  • September 2009 (20)
  • August 2009 (18)
  • July 2009 (31)
  • June 2009 (3)
  • May 2009 (9)
  • April 2009 (28)
  • March 2009 (43)
  • February 2009 (42)
  • January 2009 (91)
  • December 2008 (75)
  • November 2008 (101)
  • October 2008 (179)
  • September 2008 (228)
  • August 2008 (242)
  • July 2008 (272)
  • June 2008 (202)
  • May 2008 (192)
  • April 2008 (181)
  • March 2008 (155)
  • February 2008 (157)
  • January 2008 (122)
  • December 2007 (43)
  • November 2007 (75)
  • October 2007 (92)
  • September 2007 (83)
  • August 2007 (10)